“Theft is Theft so Sack ‘em” – Right?
How many managers have forthrightly stated this at one time or another. Theft is a severe offence and is normally viewed as gross misconduct at work. The outcome is pretty clear (after the obligatory disciplinary procedure).
Take the case of the theft of a laptop from the office. It’s high value; the evidence is caught on CCTV; there’s reliable evidence to suggest that the employee sold the laptop at the local car boot sale. So unless they can provide any other explanation at disciplinary interview, then most managers would conclude that the outcome is dismissal.
However consider making personal phone calls, or accumulating those company pens at home. These are also acts of theft, aren’t they?
Employment Tribunals use a test when deciding cases:
"Has the employer acted fairly and reasonably in all the circumstances?"
Managers have to decide where fairness and reasonableness lies. At what point do personal telephone calls become a potential disciplinary? 3 calls a day? 5 calls a day? Or, in the case of one company, the employee made personal phone calls for over half of the working day. Sometimes the standards applied have to be judged for fairness and reasonableness, and decisions made that consider all the circumstances.
The decision to discipline for any misdemeanour, and the subsequent outcome, may be influenced by a number of these circumstances:
Even with the laptop theft, what happens if the employee says they are on medication that has a known side effect of causing irrational behaviour? It just goes to show that the background and circumstances to every case has to be considered. Theft may not be theft in every case!